-
PhPanther1 said...
I've already started. Unless Savage is the 2nd coming of Russell Wilson (which i really don't), I say start Voytik/Chapman and take lumps and lose if you have to. 2014 should be the goal to go for the ACC title, 2013 is just an experince builder.
I don't see what the gain is out of 8 wins with Savage if it means you have to go into 2014 with a green qb and you ruin your chances for competing with your most explosive team since dw's 10 win squad.
-
Wh4p said...
My opinion on this matter has changed.
1, the acc is weak sauce. Besides fsu (and jimbo fisher is very much like lane kiffin...recruits well but can't coach) and maybe Clemson no else scares me.
2. Our defense should be a top 25 defense next season so winning 8-9 games isn't out of the question,
3. Tom savage was every bit the recruit voytik or chapman was. I have watched a good amount of film on Chad. I think that chapman will beat him out. I anticipate seeing savage next year and then travon for 4 years.
-
rkohberger said...
I'll agree with this pre-season assessment. I got taken over the coals on here when I said that after watching Voytik in three practices - one at the end of camp - I didn't think he was the great physical QB a lot of PITT fans do. He may turn out alright but he's no lock in my mind.
It is hard to predict that a player will start all four years but I do think Chapman will be a starter before he's a SR.
That said, I'n not completely sold on Tom Savage being the savior either. His play at the college level was a bit above average then he wasn't able to regain his starting job from an average QB in Dodd. I think Savage will start and do pretty well but nothing earthshaking.
-
Shady1 said...
as long as he doesnt have the mental breakdowns that weve seen for the past 3 years and if he wins a close game or two ill be happy because the talent is certainly there with savage. we really dont know how any of the trifecta will perform but the thing that has me excited is that the talent level which each of them is so much greater than that of the qbs weve had in a while
-
BigNick80 said...
IMO, if its even close between Savage or one of the young guys you have to play the young guy, especially Chapman who has a huge upside. Savage is one and done so the only reason to play him if if he gives the team a much better chance to win. While what folks have said about him at RU is true, we really dont know how a kid like that matures and grows as a player by sitting out a year and having time to learn an offense. We could continue to see more of what he showed at RU or he could be a kid who gets it with his last chance.
IMO, Chapman coming in early is huge in terms of him having a legit shot to compete. If he werent enrolling early Id agree he has no shot to start, But being able to work out and get coaching early, he'll have a shot,
Ive said it before and I'll say it again. WIth a kid like that, it may make sense to use him like Myer used Tebow when he was a frosh. Bring him in mostly as a running option but use the threat of the pass Give the kid some reps here and there to use his athletic ability and give hm a shot to grow..
-
Shady1 said...
i COULD agree with this as long as he passes voytik as the #2 qb. right now im going to assume it will be savage, voytik, and a rs for chapman. thats my tentative prediction that obviously can be altered. you really never know. chapman could be a gamer who makes huge plays along with his stupid frosh mistakes. frankly, id take that over a "game manager" in a heart beat. frankly, id love it if chapman starts. i mean, if his pat white comparisons are accurate and hes mature enough mentally i would have absolutely no problem with him starting as a true freshman
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Pages: 1 | 2 | Refresh

Way to go Paul!